Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume 100, Issue 9 , Pages 874-878, September 2006

Identifying the biting species in snakebite by clinical features: an epidemiological tool for community surveys

  • A. Pathmeswaran

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, P.O. Box 6, Ragama, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • A. Kasturiratne

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, P.O. Box 6, Ragama, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • M. Fonseka

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, P.O. Box 6, Ragama, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • S. Nandasena

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, P.O. Box 6, Ragama, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • D.G. Lalloo

      Affiliations

    • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 151 705 3179; fax: +44 151 708 3368.
  • ,
  • H.J. de Silva

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, P.O. Box 6, Ragama, Sri Lanka

Received 5 August 2005; received in revised form 26 September 2005; accepted 3 October 2005.

Summary 

The outcome of snakebite is related to the biting species but it is often difficult to identify the biting snake, particularly in community settings. We have developed a clinical scoring system suitable for use in epidemiological surveys, with the main aim of identifying the presumed biting species in those with systemic envenoming who require treatment. The score took into account ten features relating to bites of the five medically important snakes in Sri Lanka, and an algorithm was developed applying different weightings for each feature for different species. A systematically developed artificial data set was used to fine tune the score and to develop criteria for definitive identification. The score was prospectively validated using 134 species-confirmed snakebites. It correctly differentiated the bites caused by the three snakes that commonly cause major clinical problems (Russell's viper (RV), kraits and cobra) from other snakes (hump-nosed viper (HNV) and saw-scaled viper (SSV)) with 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity. For individual species, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively: cobra 76%, 99%; kraits 85%, 99%; and RV 70%, 99%. As anticipated, the score was insensitive in the identification of bites due to HNV and SSV.

Keywords: Snakebite, Epidemiology, Sri Lanka

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0035-9203(05)00379-2

doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.10.003

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume 100, Issue 9 , Pages 874-878, September 2006