Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume 95, Issue 1 , Pages 74-80, January 2001

An open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of envenoming by Sri Lankan Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii)

  • C.Ariaranee Ariaratnam

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • Lena Sjöström

      Affiliations

    • Protherics PLC, Macclesfield, UK
  • ,
  • Zeenia Raziek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • S. Abeyasinghe
  • ,
  • M. Kularatne

      Affiliations

    • Anuradhapura General Hospital, Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • R.W.K.Kodikara Arachchi

      Affiliations

    • Anuradhapura General Hospital, Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • M.H.Rezvi Sheriff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  • ,
  • R.David G. Theakston

      Affiliations

    • World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for the Control of Antivenoms and Venom Research Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
  • ,
  • David A. Warrell

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Professor D. A. Warrell, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; phone +44 (0)1865 220968; fax +44 (0)1865 220984.
    • Centre for Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Received 24 May 2000; received in revised form 29 June 2000; accepted 29 June 2000.

Abstract 

Russell's viper (Daboia russelii russelii) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in Sri Lanka. In a study in 1985, Haffkine equine polyspecific antivenom in doses up to 20 g proved ineffective in clearing antigenaemia and caused a high incidence of anaphylactoid reactions. A new, monospecific ovine Fabantivenom (PolongaTAb) has been developed against the venom of Sri Lankan Russell's viper and, to assess its safety and efficacy, we carried out (in 1997) an open, randomized comparison of this with the Hafikine antivenom currently in use in the country. Patients with systemic envenoming following Russell's viper bite were randomized to receive an initial intravenous dose of either 1 g of PolongaTAb (n = 23) or 10g of Haffkine antivenom (n = 20). One dose of PolongaTAb permanently restored blood coagulability in only 9 (41%) of 22 patients and 13 needed repeated doses, whereas the majority (; 70%) had restored coagulability after 1 dose of Haffkine antivenom. There was a tendency towards more rapid resolution of local swelling and systemic manifestations in the Hafifkine group. Venom antigenaemia was eliminated more quickly in the Haffkine group and ovine Fab was cleared from the circulation more rapidly than equine F(ab′)2. To evaluate safety, patients were closely observed for adverse reactions. Following a severe reaction with Haffkine antivenom all subsequent patients in this group were treated prophylactically with hydrocortisone and chlorpheniramine. Despite this, the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in the Haffkine group compared with the PolongaTAb group (81% compared with 48%) and 4 patients had a severe anaphylactic reaction in the former group. In conclusion, the new antivenom is safer than Haffkine antivenom but, to avoid repeated doses, an initial dose higher than 1 g is needed in the treatment of Sri Lankan Russell's viper envenoming. The safety of this larger dose is the subject of further studies.

Keywords:  snakebite, envenoming, Daboia russelii, antivenoms, efficacy, adverse reactions, comparative study, clinical trial, Sri Lanka

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0035-9203(01)90339-6

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume 95, Issue 1 , Pages 74-80, January 2001